REVIEW PANEL: Individual Artists Commission - Literary [1]
We strongly encourage you or a representative to attend the review panel and take notes. We recommend coming early and staying for your entire review block to hear other application reviews. Feedback from review panels is often a valuable way to contribute to artistic development, grant writing skills, and understanding the review process.
Benefits of attending the review panels:
- Get feedback on the strengths and weaknesses of your application, including project design/narrative, project budget, work sample, etc.
- Opportunity to have your work reviewed by 4-6 respected artists, administrators, and peers in the field
- Receive feedback on grantsmanship
- Get an overview of the applicant pool
- Gain insights into broader trends and field issues
- View preliminary panel rankings
The time frame in which your application will be reviewed is listed below. Scheduled times provided are estimated. We will try to keep as close to the schedule as possible but may run early or over time. At the panel, to avoid the perception of influencing deliberations inappropriately, you may not engage in conversation with the panelists.
10a - 10:45a | 1 Alice Rogoff |
2 Anthony Robles | |
3 Denise Sullivan | |
4 Heather Gibbons | |
11:00a – 11:45 | 5 Jacqueline Francis |
6 Jeffrey Martin | |
7 Josie Iselin | |
8 Juliana Delgado Lopera | |
12:50p – 1:30p | 9 Kevin Simmonds |
10 Lyzette Wanzer | |
11 Ploy Pirapokin | |
12 Sarah Jimenez | |
1:40p – 2:30p | 13 Shizue Seigel |
14 Socrates Parra | |
15 Sona Avakian | |
16 Stuart Schuffman | |
17 Truong Tran | |
2:30p-3:20p | Collect Scores |
Feedback Session | |
Review Rankings | |
END |